Does anyone else think the first book could in theory stand alone? it has a very definite ending, and though there are unanswered questions about salander’s background, it’s ok to leave some things a mystery i think. don’t get me wrong I’m glad he wrote the other two and I wish there were more, but the first book has a stand alone feel to it in my opinion. thoughts?
Posted by missuspickypins in fort collins , 1 August 2011